Wednesday, 4 September 2013
Paris
This morning our family examined Homer's Iliad starting with the story of Paris. It was foretold that Paris, son of the king of Troy would bring about its destruction. The king ordered his son to be left at Mount Ida to die. After several days a Shepherd found the baby and took him in as his own. Paris grew strong, handsome and athletic.
Things start to go awry for Paris when he attended a wedding party that was also attended by Greek gods and mortals. When Eris, god of discord, an uninvited guest, threw a golden apple upon a table that had the words, "For the fairest."
All the goddesses began to claim the prize, each certain she was the fairest.Soon the contest came down to three: Hera, queen of the gods; Athena, the goddess of wisdom; and Aphrodite, the goddess of beauty and love. Each vehemently claimed to be the fairest. And since no one could decide, Zeus was called on to choose one as the fairest of all. Zeus knew this was am impossible task. No matter whom he chose, he would be faced with two angry goddesses. So Zeus gave the task of judging to Paris, the handsome young shepherd on Mount Ida. Each of the goddesses promised Paris something if he would choose her:power and wealth; wisest of men and great in war; or the fairest woman in the world for his wife. In the end Paris chose to give the golden apple to Aphrodite.
We examined the path not taken. What if Paris had made a different selection? How would his life have unfolded?
We examined the character of the Greek gods. They were in some respects like human beings. They needed food, drink and sleep. They married, had children, quarreled, became jealous and vindictive. The Greeks gods never died, could change themselves into various forms and could make themselves invisible.
How does this compare to the God of the Hebrews, Islam and Christianity. In Genesis it is said that God made man in his own image. So we conjectured if our God was like man in any other ways.
I always put questions out there and let my children decide for themselves the way of the world.
9/4/2013
Friday, 30 August 2013
Epistemology
Today Bryan and I studied philosophy and its sub-fields: reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.
Reality (The state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible. A still more broad definition includes everything that has existed, exists, or will exist.)
Existence (The nature of being, becoming, existence, or reality, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations. It deals with questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences.)
Knowledge (The nature and scope of knowledge and is also referred to as "theory of knowledge". It questions what knowledge is and how it can be acquired, and the extent to which any given subject or entity can be known, focusing on analyzing the nature of knowledge and how it relates to connected notions such as truth, belief, and justification.)
Values ( Mainly two kinds of values: ethics and aesthetics. Ethics investigates the concepts of "right" and "good" in individual and social conduct. Aesthetics studies the concepts of "beauty" and "harmony.")
Reason (Logic)
Mind (Mental events, mental functions, mental properties, consciousness, and their relationship to the physical body, particularly the brain. The mind-body problem, i.e. the relationship of the mind to the body, is commonly seen as one key issue in philosophy of mind, although there are other issues concerning the nature of the mind that do not involve its relation to the physical body, such as how consciousness is possible and the nature of particular mental states.)
Language (Logic)
After examining these basic premises as falling into the areas of philosophy, we examined epistemology in greater detail.
Epistemology is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge, such as the relationships between truth, belief, and theories of justification.
Skepticism is the position which questions the possibility of completely justifying any truth. The regress argument, a fundamental problem in epistemology, occurs when, in order to completely prove any statement, its justification itself needs to be supported by another justification. This chain can do three possible options;one option is infinitism, where this chain of justification can go on forever;another option is foundationalism, where the chain of justifications eventually relies on basic beliefs or axioms that are left unproven; the last option, such as in coherentism, is making the chain circular so that a statement is included in its own chain of justification.
It was interesting examining the definition of skepticism. I will definitely take note if anyone ever calls me a skeptic.
Poor Bryan always has to listen to his mother dwell on things that are in the of her own interests!
8/30/2013
Wednesday, 28 August 2013
Best Reader Goes To...
Breeanna is listening to Andrew Lang's The Yellow Fairy Book on Librivox's free audio book.
http://librivox.org/the-yellow-fairy-book-by-andrew-lang/
Bryan is listening to Anthony Hope's, The Prisoner of Zenda. The book is so well read. It is captivating and has Bryan engrossed.
http://librivox.org/the-prisoner-of-zenda-by-anthony-hope/
On our way to the bus stop this morning, I read The Tale of Desperaux to Breeanna trying my best to be as masterful as I could in its presentation.
Afterwards I asked Breeanna if I read better than her dad. She said, "No."
A crushing blow, although I think, not entirely honest! My estimation of my reading is masterful, brilliant, and sublime! At least I am trying to convince her of that!
Tuesday, 27 August 2013
I, Too, Am America
Today for morning homeschooling, our family read Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: The Red Headed League by Arthur Conan Doyle.
Poems were Oh Captain! My Captain! and I Hear America Singing by Walt Whitman.
Also, I, Too by Lanston Hughes.
I, too, sing America
I am the darker brother.
They send me to eat in the kitchen. When company comes,
But I laugh,
And eat well,
And grow strong.
Tomorrow,
I'll be at the table
When company comes.
Nobody will dare
Say to me,
"Eat in the kitchen,"
Then.
Besides,
They'll see how beautiful I am
And be ashamed--
I, too, am America.
I am proud to be American, a country that can right its wrongs.
Monday, 26 August 2013
Just A Minute
We had a late night last night, 9:30pm. Breeanna urged me to tuck her into bed. I told her to go ahead. I'd be there in a minute. I packed away the groceries, did the dishes. Thirty minutes went by. Breeanna came to the kitchen wrapped in blanket and sat on my lap. She said in a sleepy tone that she had been waiting for me. I encircled her entirely in my arms and said, "Mommy will be right there." as I sent her back to bed once more. With a tender sleepy voice she said, "OK mommy,' and headed back toward the bedroom.
I thought to myself, "I could move mountains for that voice.".
I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings
Morning. I was fearful that the children would be under dressed as we walked out the door. You never know what the weather would be from one day to the next in Ohio.
We read excerpts from Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl and then, Maya Angelou's biography, I know Why the Caged Bird Sings. Angelou described the difficulty near impossibility of getting ahead for a black person of her time. I love her grandmother's morning prayer, "Our Father, thank you for letting me see this new day. Thank you that you didn't allow the bed I lay on last night to be my cooling board. Guide my feet this day along the straight and narrow and help me put a bridle upon my tongue. Bless this house and everyone in it. Thank you. Amen.".
Angelou said during her time in Stamps, she met and fell in love with William Shakespeare because he said, "When in disgrace with fortune and men's eyes..." which was a state she felt herself most familiar.
Bryan and Breeanna humored me by attempting to follow along in my reading of the troubled lives of people long ago until I continued to ply them with Kennedy's Inaugural Address, at which point they rebelled with various interruptions. Their punishment was minutes of jumping up and down: 1 minute for interrupting my reading, another for whining about the justification for the interruption and another for talking back, 3 in all. The school bus arrived and saved them from the full execution of their punishment.
Friday, 23 August 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)